Specific policies usually originate from general ideas.  Once those policies begin to be implemented, the action process begins. Yet, only a small minority of ideas have actionable consequences. The 2016 Republican effort focused upon must-do ideas designed to keep faith with Trump’s base.

Racist-tinged policies were obvious throughout the campaign. Mexicans ( and other Hispanics), were rhetorically tarred and feathered along with Muslims. On a more selective basis, so were African-Americans. Once the election was over, those attitudes became encompassed in policies that sought to restrict immigration on the basis of race and/or religion, tighten voting requirements, and restrict health care. Each would disproportionately harm people of color. As if this was not enough, six months into his term Trump applauded the “good people on both sides” who were involved in a race riot in Charlottesville, Virginia instigated by white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

Within the same time frame, a ban on Muslims entering the United States and severe restrictions on our southern border were enacted. The latter included a Child Separation component whose most relevant  comparison was the forced removal of Jewish children from their parents by the Nazis during World War II.

In terms of the environment, Trump withdrew the United States from the international climate agreement, opting for further destruction of the planet in order to appease  supporters and/or those who denied climate science.

Internationally, the President projected his prejudices (e.g. “shit-hole countries”), Obama envy (i.e. nullifying agreements created by his predecessor), ignorance and recklessness. In essence, the world became a stage for Trump to play the role of “global leader” despite his lack of gravitas, understanding of history and leadership qualities. The “con man”  was always in close proximity to the launch codes, but that seemed not to matter to our “Enablers.”

So far, in this enumeration of problematic policies and actions, I have avoided discussing the administration’s support for the Religious Right, extremists in general, and Israel and the Middle East.  Concerns about the media, along with sharing some insights into the personal behavior and attitudes of our “leadership” cadre are up next. Stay tuned.